Upcoming Events
Third event
Monday 18th May and Tuesday 19th May 2020
The Institute for Risk and Uncertainty at the University of Liverpool will host this exciting conclusion to our three-part Raw Milk series. These day-long events are open to the public and feature invited speakers, proffered presentations and posters, session on collaborations and proposal opportunties, and open discussion on the advantages and risks of raw milk, use and misuse of statistics, consumer protection regulations, and the challenges of balancing costs and benefits in any decision.
Some argue that pasteurisation of milk robs consumers of essential heath benefits. Others worry that raw milk can carry disease bacteria leading to illness or even death. Scientific evidence documents both benefits and risks associated with drinking raw milk, but public health authorities often emphasise on risks. Is this smart?
- Should potentially dangerous products be legally available and easily accessible?
- Should families be free to make their own decisions?
- Will would-be consumers driven to a black market when products are banned?
- How should consumer protection regulations be justified?
Past events
Second event
Thursday 08th August 2019, 10:00 - 17:00
The Institute for Risk and Uncertainty at the University of Liverpool will host this second event in our three-part Raw Milk series. These day-long events are open to the public and feature invited speakers, proffered presentations and posters, session on collaborations and proposal opportunities, and open discussion on the advantages and risks of raw milk, use and misuse of statistics, consumer protection regulations, and the challenges of balancing costs and benefits in any decision.
The event will also feature open discussion on effective and ethical use of communication methods in risk analysis, and the use and abuse of statistics and other communication tools in protecting public health. Communicating risks and uncertainties about risk is famously difficult and fraught by misconceptions. Unintentional—and intentional—confusion can be created by common formatting even when the underlying information is true. People often have undue belief in numbers given by government or advertisers. In the age of lost trust and fake news, it is often difficult to know whom to believe, especially when the messages are complex or include quantitative claims. The famous Churchill quote "The only statistics I believe are the ones I doctored myself" was not actually uttered by Winston Churchill, and the quotation is itself an instance of fake news
Speakers
Jose Palma-Oliveira
University of Lisbon
A returning speaker and environmental psychologist. Dr. Palma-Oliveira previously spoke on how the health risks of raw milk cheese were communicated to communities that often incorporate it as a staple food in their diets (such as in Portugal). It looked at the interplay between researchers, industry, and local communities to better develop communicative tools and foster understanding.
Dominic Duckett
James Hutton Institute
A researcher from the James Hutton Institute who specialises in Social Theories of Risk, as well as the Sociology of Food and Agriculture. Having previously worked on topics such as the social amplification of risk, Dr. Duckett now focuses his work on changes in food culture and sustainability as part of a large interdisciplinary team.
Bronwen Percival
Renowned Author and Chair of the Technical Committee at the RMPA will be discussing the roles of industry bodies such as the RMPA, as well the FSA raw milk policy working group, with the current chair of the RMPA Jonny Crickmore. She will also speak about how these entities help mediate the communication between producers and consumers to ensure that the public are made aware of any potential health concerns and risks.
Francis Percival
Returning for another talk, the renowned Author and co-convener of the London Gastronomy Seminars spoke of the cultural and economic benefits of raw milk cheese and how it fits into British dairy production
Jorge Hernandez Hormazabal
UoL Management School
Dr. Jorge E. Hernandez is a Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) and module leader for Operations and Simulation Management and Business Analysis. His main contributions are regarded to the continuous enhancement and delivery of up-to-date subjects in the field of Operations and Supply Chain Management. This, by gathering current and up-to-date challenges, requirements, and constraints from a variety of sector for which, Dr. Hernandez, is directly involved, such as Automotive Industry, HealthCare, and Agriculture
Scott Ferson
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty
Scott Ferson is director of the Institute for Risk and Uncertainty at the University of Liverpool in the UK. For many years he was senior scientist at Applied Biomathematics in New York and taught risk analysis at Stony Brook University. He has over a hundred publications, mostly in risk analysis and uncertainty propagation, and is a fellow of the Society for Risk Analysis. His recent research, funded mostly by NIH and NASA, focuses on reliable statistical tools when empirical information is very sparse, and distribution-free methods for risk analysis.
Schedule
Thursday 08th August 2019
10:00 |
Scott Ferson |
Introduction |
10:30 |
Jose Palma-Oliveira |
How to “Promote" or to “Demonise" Raw milk Consumption: Risk perception and communication strategies |
11:45 |
Dominic Duckett |
Mala Leche: Societal disagreements about risk |
13:00 |
Lunch Break |
|
14:15 |
Bronwen Percival |
Better Communication, Better Regulation |
15:30 |
Francis Percival |
Communicating risk or rent-seeking behaviour? When raw milk cheese meets the Establishment |
Friday 09th August 2019
11:00 |
Scott Ferson |
A case study on Chilean dairy production |
|
14:00 |
Panel Discussion on Risk Communication |
Jorge Hernandez Hormazabal, Dominic Duckett, Bronwen Percival, Alex Wimbush |
Abstract
Regulation of unpasteurised milk, like many issues lately, has become controversial. Some argue that pasteurisation of milk robs consumers of essential heath benefits. Others worry that raw milk can carry disease bacteria leading to illness or even death. Scientific evidence documents both benefits and risks associated with drinking raw milk, but public health authorities often emphasise on risks. When should government make the decision for consumers?
- Should potentially dangerous products be legally available and easily accessible?
- Should families be free to make their own decisions?
- Will would-be consumers driven to a black market when products are banned?
- How should consumer protection regulations be justified?
- Can we effectively communicate risks and benefits to consumers?